Transparency

Editorial policy

Mental health information can affect important decisions. Our content standards prioritize accuracy, clarity, source quality, and honest limits over search-engine volume.

Sources

Health claims should be supported by current primary research, systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, or authoritative public-health sources. We link to sources so readers can inspect the underlying information.

Clinical review

Educational material is not a substitute for individual care. Before this project offers clinical services, condition- and treatment-related content should be reviewed by an appropriately qualified, named professional. A reviewer’s credentials and the review date should be shown on the relevant page.

Updates and corrections

Pages display a meaningful update date. Material changes should be recorded when they affect clinical meaning. If you identify an error, retain the URL and details so the issue can be investigated and corrected rather than silently obscured.

Commercial separation

Clinical accuracy must not depend on advertising, affiliate arrangements, or ranking goals. Any sponsorship or commercial relationship should be labeled where a reader encounters it.

Use of automation

Automation may assist drafting or quality checks, but factual health content requires source verification and accountable human review before publication. Content should never be mass-produced solely to manipulate search rankings.

Page last updated: August 18, 2026. General information only; not medical advice.